Page 1 of 2

Navigation question

Posted: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:11 am
by Riddler
New to the site. How do the 2011s look with the navigation? I haven't seen it in person, but I saw one picture and it looked pretty bad. I was hoping the picture I saw wasn't accurate. I've been unable to find any other pictures of the navigation unit in the car.

Re: Navigation question

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:05 am
by Riddler
It can't be a good sign that nobody has responded to my inquiry. The GPS must be bad.

Re: Navigation question

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 5:46 am
by Moto
I have only ever seen a few photos of kizashis with Nav systems. I don't think nav is overly common on the kizashi. I do know that the nav is touch-screen so unless you have seen one that is actually on it isn't very impressive.

Re: Navigation question

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:13 am
by chazyouwin
Saw the nav on a brochure at the dealer in Green Brook, NJ, and thought it looked fine. But all the cars they showed me didn't have it in there. I prefer my own unit; wasn't looking for one. Best of luck.

Re: Navigation question

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 3:48 am
by Riddler
Thanks for the replies. I am surprised that nobody on this site has a car with a nav in it. I know people who refuse to buy a car without a built-in nav because the portable navs can lose signal.

Re: Navigation question

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 7:27 am
by chazyouwin
That may be, but I like to upgrade my Garmin nav systems every couple of years. Harder to do with a built in. Have seen some relatively late model Mercedes et al. with some nasty looking nav systems.

Re: Navigation question

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 2:41 am
by Riddler
Finally found a video showing the nav on:

[youtube][/youtube]

@1:37

Re: Navigation question

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 3:42 am
by VicLikesCars2
Riddler wrote:Thanks for the replies. I am surprised that nobody on this site has a car with a nav in it. I know people who refuse to buy a car without a built-in nav because the portable navs can lose signal.
Sorry, Riddler, but no Nav for my car either. I'm old school... I prefer a simple map or Road Atlas. I just want the basic car ( 10 Kizashi "S" with 6sp man.) without Blue Tooth, Sat radio, or computer-music connections. If I had a moon roof, I wouldn't use it. (I've had several sun/moon roofs on other cars, and momma's KIA Forte Koup SX has one that she doesn't use much.) All the electronics just get to be too much.

Re: Navigation question

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:11 pm
by rehmbo
Here's a picture of the navigation system.

Re: Navigation question

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 9:40 pm
by havinfun
I am not a fan of built-in navigation systems. They are almost always significantly higher in price than an after-market unit, and at least the units I am most familiar with (Toyota) require purchase of a disk to update the software, and the disk updates are about $250 each. Further, on my Toyota, the navigation touch screen needlessly complicates the operation of the stereo by nesting common control functions (like CD selection) so that non-techies really struggle to perform even simple things with the stereo, setting the clock, etc. Further, the Toyota nav system won't let you input to it unless the car is not moving (presumably for safety). This makes the Toyota unit frustrating to use by the passenger to check for restaurants, gas stations, or alternative routes while you are driving. I cannot speak specifically about the Kizashi nav system on this issue, however, and would like to hear how easy others find its functionality.

On the plus side, the nav screen doubles as a screen for the rear-vision camera. I really like that feature on our Toyota.

On Kizashi's with nav I have test driven, I have noticed that the screen is recessed into the dash (unlike the stereo head unit which is somewhat rounded and "flows" with the contour of the dash). In my view, the nav system looks like an after-market add-on.